May 03, 2007

Focus: Fix New York State

Local business owner and CEO Joe Klein speaks out about New York politics and what needs to be done to reform the state to keep people, companies, and jobs here. Klein, a life-long resident of Rochester and owner of Klein Steel Services, Inc., knows first hand the challenges that face companies within Upstate New York. In a recent interview, he reiterates a few key items of what he believes must happen.

BSM (Business Strategies Magazine): Joe, you made headlines last year for your controversial remarks at the Small Business Council luncheon. Recently, you expressed your thoughts about local business economics, and politics in an essay that appeared in the Democrat and Chronicle. How would you sum up the most pressing issues facing Joe_klein Governor Eliot Spitzer at this time?

Klein: Unfortunately, I think we’re in worse shape than last October. Our amount of job loss and unemployment is in direct relationship to the state’s budget overspending, which is basically triple the cost of inflation. Our Governor, Senate and Assembly should NOT be proud of this. However, I do think that Governor Spitzer truly wants to fix the problems of New York. He needs to continue to tell the people of our state to keep speaking out until they force our legislators to take action.

In all probability, Governor Spitzer isn’t going to be able to persuade the Assembly and Senate to do what we need to do. Just look at the top political contributors—they will make sure this never sees the light of day. Basically, legislators are willfully ignorant or they're divorced from reality or simply lining their pockets.

Here are the issues I think we have to address in moving forward to reform our state of New York:

  • Fix our electoral voting districts. Stop the gerrymandering of electoral districts. Fair voting districts must be created. Look to Iowa as an example of creating fair voting districts. (Unlike New York)

  • Spending is up 9 % in this year's budget. In estimation, this could cost 30,000 jobs in Upstate. The budget should be getting an F grade. It is as bad as any budget in the last 20 years and the legislators and Governor should be ashamed of it.

Continue reading "Focus: Fix New York State" »

May 02, 2006

BizCast/BizStrategist -
Interview with Thomas Friedman

If The World Is Flat, what does that mean for Rochester businesses?

Find out in this interview with author Thomas Friedman, conducted by executive coach Jennifer Sertl.

Click the Play > button, or download the MP3 version.


MP3 File

April 20, 2006

BizStrategist - Interview: Moshe Safdie

Safdie A graduate of  McGill University, Safdie took charge of the master plan for the 1967 World Exhibition, where he also realized an adaptation of his thesis as Habitat '67, the central feature of the World's Fair.

He was responsible for major segments of the restoration of the Old City in Jerusalem and the reconstruction of the new center, linking the Old and New Cities.

Safdie has taught at Yale, McGill, and Ben Gurion Universities. He was responsible for the design of six of Canada's principal public institutions as well as many in the U.S. including educational facilities, civic buildings, and performing arts centers. His current work includes two airports.

Safdie has written several books including his upcoming theoretical work discussing the architecture of humanity in the age of mega-scale. He has been featured in several films and has been the recipient of numerous awards, honorary degrees, and civil honors.

What were the influences on your design for the Renaissance Square?
The Renaissance Square is a very complex urban design puzzle. The project has very wide ranging objectives. On one hand it's trying to revitalize downtown; it's trying to bring people back to downtown; it's trying to clean up the transportation mess that is there today. One objective is to have a very efficient bus terminal. The other one is to use the bus terminal as a catalyst for other functions so that the performing arts center and the college — together with the transportation elements — work in synergy with each other. So you begin with trying to develop a response to that puzzle, how to put things together in a way that they complement each other and reinforce each other. So it's more reading the issues and responding to their problem-solving that you begin with rather than sort of external design influences.

How much influence did the Urban Land Institute's recommendations have?
In a direct way, not at all, but in a broader way I'm very sympathetic and I'm after the same objectives that the Urban Land Institute is after. There have been land institutes that have spent many years studying downtowns — why they deteriorated, how to revitalize them. They understand the role of retail, what retail works in the way of encouraging pedestrian flow in the city, the damage done by introverted internal retail malls in the downtown areas. They are experts as to what created problems in the city in the past 30 years...and since we are students of the same issues, our responses are very similar. We understood from the outset that it is the flow of people from transportation to other functions that become the key to making this area work better; how to deal with street fronts and how to use the existing historic buildings on the site to great advantage. These are all issues we've dealt with that I'm sure the Urban Land Institute would be equally concerned with. We have the same agenda.


What obstacles do you see in the development of this project?

I think the biggest obstacle is getting all the parties who are part of this to come to consensus because while there is a common agenda, there are also

"The Renaissance Square is a very complex urban
design puzzle. . .
You begin with trying to develop a response to that puzzle, how to put things together in a way that they complement and reinforce each other."

individual agendas. The college is worried about getting a very good college to be working there. The transportation people are worried about their own efficiency. The performing arts and arts groups have their own agenda. At the same time thereÕs a common agenda. So one issue is to get everybody to buy into a consensus of what works the best for the individual groups as well as the whole, the city. The second challenge is monetary: there is always going to be a gap between the available resources and what everybody wants to do there. In fact I'd say from the outset the funds available clearly already committed are sort of crawling behind the aspirations that each group has for their own facility. That is also going to be a challenge — how to make resources stretch to achieve what everybody wants to achieve.

How do you strike a favorable balance between function and form?
It's never a contradiction. You pursue satisfying the purpose of a building, which to me is a better word than function because function tends to sound utilitarian, and that will help you evolve architecturally satisfying forms. There is no contradiction between the two in my approach to architecture. They merge together. They grow together.

How are your projects designed to change the way a community functions as well as views itself?
I think a project has a potential when designed in a creative and uplifting way to change the sense of the community and of itself. I've achieved it in such buildings as the Salt Lake Public Library or the Peabody Essex Museum. Whole cities have sort of transformed their sense of themselves and their self image as a result of having my buildings in those communities. But if I could tell you what the prescription for achieving it is, that's a complex and long journey.

Would you tell us what your favorite building is and why you feel that way?
Rensqsketch There is absolutely no way I could even begin to answer this question because I have so many favorite buildings in different places for different reasons and with different affections. It's like asking me which is my favorite child amongst my four children. I just can't answer that because I have so many favorite buildings. It's just not possible.

Which architects had the greatest influence on you?
Many architects kind of had an influence on me in a direct wayLouis Cobb because I apprenticed with him and worked with him in my youth, so this was a very direct influence. But since I began being an architect, as a young architect, I admired the work of Frank Lloyd Wright. It was very inspiring for me as I evolved as an architect to know his work. I was equally influenced and excited by visiting great towns and cities, which probably were not designed by architects at all, like the hill towns of Italy or the villages of the Middle East. These have always been inspiring even though probably we can't quite name the architect who designed them.